Decades of Leadership in the Software Testing Industry

AscentialTest has been forming in the minds of our founders for several years. After building QA Partner/SilkTest at Segue Software in the 90s, they got the opportunity to use their product extensively in the field. As consultants implementing test automation with various tools for more than 10 years, they’ve formed a thorough assessment of the state of the field. What they found surprised them: automated tests were too expensive to build.

Furthermore, the requirement for programming skills to move beyond the superficial tests that can be recorded left out too many members of the team. They also discovered that a large portion of test development time is spent ‘writing code’ to workaround object recognition deficiencies. Some users estimate that time to approach 80%. Clearly this explains why the decision to adopt automation is not always straightforward. With a fresh understanding of the challenges and our heads full of ideas, we’re energized and excited to bring about the next paradigm shift in test automation.

Brian has been working in the field of test automation for more than 30 years. Brian began as a QA Engineer using the testing tools available in the early 1980’s. He joined Segue Software in its infancy and served as the EVP of R&D during that company’s golden years. Brian formed Star Quality, a consulting firm specializing in test automation in the late 90s. After 12 years of experience in the trenches, he’s excited to be building the next generation testing tool that will increase the productivity and and effectiveness of test and development teams.

Dave is a pioneer in the field of automated testing. Dave developed ATF, one of the first automation tools, more than 20 yeas ago. He was a founder and Chief Architect of Segue Software, Inc., the original creators of QA Partner/SilkTest. Dave believes that no testing tool can be easy to use without a solid foundation. That’s why he is committed to providing AscentialTest’s universal agent with the most powerful object recognition engine in the industry.

Pricing Plans - Solo Testers to Large Enterprise Teams

Not seeing a pricing package that fits your needs? Want to compare us directly to a competitor’s offering? Tell us more, let us take a shot at providing a custom or lower cost package.

Subscription

Solo Testers

Starting at $200/mo

“The Selenium Killer”

Subscription

Teams

Starting at $380/mo

Subscription

Unlimited

Starting at $6k/mo

Perpetual License

Teams

Starting at $8.4k

Perpetual License

Unlimited

Other Resources

Upcoming Webinar

Building Reusable Verification Tests

Tue, Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM EDT

The participant will learn:
* How indirection and dynamic instantiation are used to build generic test steps
* How to create universal verification steps and functions
* About built-in functions that provide information about the current state of the target application
* How metadata can be used to set object-related test data
* How to create a test that walks the main menu of an application, opening and closing each dialog

See How We Achieved an 83% Five Star Rating on Gartner

See how AscentialTest compares to the competition, using 18 key features and functions and across 14 different development platforms

  • Supported Platforms (14)
  • Integrated Test Planning
  • Object Recognition
  • Object Repository
  • Test Frameworks
  • Foreign Language UX
  • Drag Generations of Actions
  • Reusable Steps
  • Scripting
  • Manual Testing
  • Parallel Execution
  • Integrated Defect Tracking
  • Test Localization
  • Test Portability
  • Test Management
  • Test Execution Management
  • Integrated Version Control
  • Integrated Test Management

Eggplant

Gartner 5 Star Reviews:

0 %

TestComplete

Gartner 5 Star Reviews:

0 %

Tosca

Gartner 5 Star Reviews:

0 %

Ranorex Studio

Gartner 5 Star Reviews:

0 %

Features

Platforms

Zeenyx Academy

AscentialTest Defining Tabbed Windows

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Introduction

AscentialTest users often ask how to define App Objects for tabbed windows. While there are several possible approaches, this paper presents what Zeenyx Support considers the best practice.

Exploring the Alternatives:

Tabbed windows are often implemented within a top level window like a Dialogbox or MDIChild.

Here is an example. This MDIChild has three tabbed windows: Account, Departments and Notes:

There are three general approaches that we’ve seen our customers use to define tabbed windows:

  • Define a single top level App Object with the elements of all the tabs
  • Define each tabbed window as a top level App Object
  • Define the tabbed windows and their contained elements within a single top level App Object

The first option is clearly not a good choice because AscentialTest will not be able to determine whether the target tab window is the active tab. Synchronization issues are likely to result.

The second option is reasonable enough but the relationship between the tabbed windows may not be as clear and there is the potential to have many more top level window definitions.

Our preference is to define a single top level AppObject and then nest the tabbed windows beneath it, along with their respective elements. The class of the tabbed window will vary depending on the implementation. Examples are provided below.

Defining the Top Level Window:

Rather than using the standard approach of dragging and dropping the ‘All’ button to define the top level window and its contents, when defining tabbed windows, it is better to drag over the top level window element from the Elements panel.

In the example above, the MDIChild is dragged to the App Objects panel to define the top level window. In other cases, the top level window might be of the class ‘Dialogbox’ or ‘Window’.

Defining the Tabs:

In most cases there will be an element of the class ‘TabGroup’ displayed in the Elements panel:

That TabGroup can be dragged from either the Elements panel or the Snapshot Image. In either case an AppObject will be defined for the TabGroup and the set of tabs:

Our preference is to rename ‘xTabGroup’ to ‘Tabs’. You may adopt your own naming convention.

Defining the Tabbed Windows:

The next step is to define the tabbed windows. It is at this point where your application may differ from our examples since there are a lot of different ways that tabbed windows can be implemented. Nevertheless, you will be able to use our examples as a reference. If you have any doubts, send the snapshot to [email protected] and ask for suggestions.

In this first example, the tabbed window is a member of the class ‘PbForm’:

The easiest way to define it, is to drag the PbForm element from the Elements panel to the App Objects panel. Then drag all of the elements on the form from the Snapshot image. Remember you can hold down the <Ctrl> key and click on the elements that you want to define, so that you can drag them as a group instead of defining them one by one.

In this second example, the tabbed window is a member of the class ‘Window’:

To define an object of the class ‘Window’, drag the Window element from the Elements panel to the App Objects panel. In the App Object Editor, change the Object Class to ‘Window’. Then right-click on the Window element in the Elements panel and copy to the clipboard. Paste the contents of the clipboard into the path statement and provide a meaningful Object Name. Then drag all of the elements on the window from the Snapshot image. Remember you can hold down the <Ctrl> key and click on the elements that you want to define so that you can drag them as a group instead of defining them one by one.

If you have any questions about defining your tabbed windows, please contact Zeenyx Support at [email protected]. We are here to answer your questions.

 

Share the Post:

Related Content

Instructional Content, Thought Leadership

It’s Finally Here: A Custom Elements Kit for Automated Testing

Instructional Content

PowerBuilder App Testing: What To Know, Which Tools Work

Instructional Content, Thought Leadership

A Thousand G2 “Dislikes” (Part 2): Testing Tools Have Speed Issues

Instructional Content, Thought Leadership

A Thousand G2 Reviews Later: Software Testing Tools Are Too Expensive

Get Started Today: 6 Month Free Trial

Click here to download the Host ID generator. The download package includes full instructions. Please send us your details below to speed the process along.

Get a Competitive Quote

Our Distribution and Consulting Partners

Appeon

Cigniti

Loop Software

Marlabs

Matryxsoft Tech

Novalys

OCS Consulting

Loading...

What We Are Up To Next

TFS/Azure Integration

Check our new Azure extension for executing AscentialTest command lines in the Azure Marketplace.

We look forward to offering additional integration with Microsoft’s Team Foundation Server and Azure through defect tracking and version control soon.

Omnis Studio

Automated testing support for OMNIS Studio is coming soon. All OMNIS elements will be supported including complex grids, list boxes, tables and tree views.

Custom Objects

Add automated testing support easily for your custom application elements by responding to simple test API messages with json strings. This feature will open up the possibility of testing any GUI element and  will be offered free of charge.

Test Debugger

Set breakpoints in your automated tests, view global and local variables and execute statements to make it easier to debug tests running on any of our supported platforms.

Thank you for submitting your inquiry!

We will get back to you ASAP.  We aim to respond to all inquiries within 24 hours.